|
Papers
The
State of Working Class Struggle and Labour Media in South Africa
By Martin Jansen
Thank you very much to
the organisers of the conference for inviting me and especially
to share some information, insight and experiences of the South
African situation pertaining to the struggle of the working class,
the state of the labour movement and of course labour media.
In order to understand
the South Africa of today one needs to understand its unique history,
which lie in the developments at the turn of the 20th century, which
could be summed up as a monopoly capitalist revolution from above.
This was in contrast to England, elsewhere in Europe and in America,
where monopoly capitalist rule during the imperialist epoch emerged
after about 50-100 years of progressive capitalist development.
Monopoly capitalism was brutally transplanted into South Africa
over a much shorter and more concentrated period of time and at
a relatively late stage of the imperialist epoch.
Within a few decades of the discovery of diamonds and gold, in the
1870s and 1880s, a huge capitalist social revolution occurred, radically
transforming all social relations in South Africa. This was a bourgeois
revolution from above, fought in the name of the monopoly capitalist
bourgeoisie. Vast amounts of British, American and South African
capital were invested in diamond and gold mining.
A new black working class of migrant miners was created at a forced
pace, causing great social misery and devastation in the pre-capitalist
societies of South and Southern Africa.
In the period 1899-1902
a bloody three-year long imperialist war, the Anglo-Boer War, was
fought on South African soil, resulting in the triumph of the imperialism
over the semi-feudal Afrikaner landowners. A new racist capitalist
state and White bourgeois democracy was established in 1910. For
the White monopoly capitalist bourgeoisie, liberal democracy, with
its notions of universal rights and freedoms, including one-parson-one-vote,
was an unaffordable luxury. The black majority of workers and peasants
were excluded from this racist democracy. At the same time, the
racist capitalist state played a key role in systematically co-opting
white workers and the petty-bourgeoisie into supporting monopoly
capitalist relations. This co-option largely occurred under the
banner of Afrikaner nationalism.
The new racist state
ensured rapid capitalist development and over the past 100 years
of monopoly capitalist rule, first the colonial state and then,
from 1910, the racist capitalist state assisted in the further expansion
the monopoly capitalist national bourgeoisie from mining into other
sectors of the economy. To assist overall capitalist development,
the state developed infrastructure and systems of transport and
communication. It established para-statal companies in key sectors
(iron and steel, coal production and electricity generation). It
also assisted in the emergence and consolidation of an Afrikaans-speaking
bourgeoisie, that also became increasingly monopoly capitalist in
character.
Naturally, to secure
its racial capitalist framework of white wealth and privilege and
black exclusion and oppression, it had to have effective and large
repressive organs of state to ensure the suppression of the black
masses and their organizations. It therefore also guaranteed the
maintenance of law and order, including the suppression of strikes
and other forms of mass unrest. Even White workers were violently
crushed in the miners’ strike of 1922. In the period after
the Second World War, the apartheid-capitalist state brutally suppressed
the 1946 mineworkers strike and crushed the mass struggles of the
1950s, banning the ANC, the PAC and the SACP and jailing thousands
of leaders.
Having crushed the mass
uprising, the apartheid-capitalist state presided over the boom
years of economic growth in the 1960s. These years saw the further
strengthening of monopoly capitalism, including the increased merger
of English- and Afrikaans-speaking monopoly capitalist corporations,
as well as the establishment of foreign monopoly capitalist firms,
especially in the manufacturing sector. The apartheid state introduced
a range of new oppressive laws, expanded its bureaucracy and repressive
apparatuses (police, army, courts) and consolidated the monstrous
Bantustan system to keep the black working class divided and in
a state of fear and subservience. All these actions served to stabilize
conditions of capital accumulation and to raise the rate of profit
to record levels.
Despite this, the black
working class regrouped and responded in the context of economic
crisis and declining living standards during the early 1970’s.
And in 1973, we experience and mass re-awakening of working class
struggle through the Durban strikes which saw over 70 000 workers
come out in spontaneous strikes. This re-ignited the movement and
was the beginning of the new progressive left-wing trade unions
that led to the formation first of FOSATU and later COSATU in 1985.
Moreover it sparked a
radical and militant struggle movement that was to last two decades.
This struggle, that involved vast sections of the working class
and often led by the trade union movement through COSATU, reached
heights of struggle that bordered on insurrection or even pre-revolution
until eventually the Apartheid regime entered into negotiations
with the liberation movement leaders, primarily the ANC to end Apartheid
and introduce a new democratic dispensation based on universal suffrage
of one person, one vote.
COSATU Then and Now
During the 1980’s,
COSATU was at the forefront of the Mass Democratic Movement, along
with the United Democratic Front, in the struggle for freedom from
oppression and exploitation against the Apartheid government and
the capitalist class. At the time, COSATU’s radicalism, militancy
and strength of organization elevated it to being the most revered
and respected trade union organization in the world. Millions of
workers in South Africa and the world looked towards COSATU as a
shining example of struggle against capitalism and advancing the
struggle for socialism. Today, COSATU is a shadow of its former
self, largely inactive in mass struggles and its focus of activity
has shifted away from struggles on the ground, workplaces and communities,
to the boardrooms of NEDLAC and similar fora. I say this despite
the several general strikes around COSATU’s jobs and poverty
campaign as these campaigns are designed and carried out extremely
bureaucratically, without much involvement and direction given by
ordinary COSATU members. The centre of this campaign and like so
many others in recent years is located at the level of the COSATU
CEC and its office-bearers.
Many of its current leaders,
union officials and several shop-stewards at various levels and
in most of its affiliated trade unions, have degenerated politically,
with very little inclination to lead and immerse themselves into
mass struggles around issues that affect their members or working
class communities. The trade union movement in South Africa, with
COSATU at its helm, has essentially become bureaucratized with very
little democratic participation of its members and little or no
inclination towards the orientation of the COSATU during the 1980’s,
namely radical, militant and organized and generally inspired by
the struggle for socialism as an integral part of the struggle to
overthrow the then Apartheid regime. However, upon careful historical
scrutiny of COSATU then and now, we will observe as many of us knew
then, that the dominant political currents within COSATU were not
by any means revolutionary and were thoroughly reformist in their
political orientations. This understanding goes a long way to explaining
the COSATU and its affiliates’ leadership’s ready acceptance
of the negotiated political settlement and betrayal of working class
interests by the ANC and the Tri-partite Alliance.
The Socio-economic Conditions
of the South African Working Class
In addition to the loss of millions of jobs, working class people
have also been set back in various ways and have seen a drastic
drop in their living standards.
According to the Bureau for Market Research;
• In real terms, from 1995 to 2000, the average working class
household has seen a 19% fall in income.
• 37% of households survive on less than R1000 (US$140) per
month.
• Workers have debts of R15-billion with micro-lenders, R10-billion
with furniture retailers and R18-billion with their local municipalities.
Widespread poverty was a feature of life under apartheid and remains
so under the new democracy. However, mass poverty coincides with
record level socio-economic nequalities. After all, we are the second
most unequal society in the world! These intolerable inequalities
have in fact, despite the achievements of the new democracy, intensified
over the past ten years. Mass poverty, appalling living and health
conditions and gross socio-economic inequalities coincide with numerous
indices of social disintegration - violence, abuse, crime, alcoholism,
substance abuse, family and household breakdown and prostitution.
The HIV/AIDS pandemic magnifies all these terrible features of social
and economic life in South Africa.
The Taylor Report commissioned
by government and done by reputable social researchers estimated
that between 20 and 28 million South Africans, i.e. between 45 and
63 percent of the population are currently living in poverty. 71%
of people in rural areas are poor while 29 % of people in urban
areas are poor. The average poor household in rural areas would
need an increase in income of over 70% to reach the poverty line,
compared more than 40% in metropolitan areas. About 13, 7 million
people, live in rural areas and 85% of rural African households
earned less than R1500 (US$200) per month. Young African women in
the rural areas have the highest chance of being unemployed in South
Africa.
This extreme and deteriorating situation has even forced the Minister
of Social Development was to remark, “South Africa is experiencing
a deep social crisis. Indeed we are sitting on a time bomb of poverty
and social disintegration” (2002)
Ironically, the South
African “democratic breakthrough”, for the working class
has meant being bled to death by the capitalist system.
Despite these socio-economic
setbacks organised labour and the working class remains resilient
and willing to fight to defend itself. However, not many consistent
struggles on the part of COSATU and other working class formations
have happened over the last number of years. Trade unions and other
organisations have in fact been weakened, despite the democratic
space and opportunities when compared to the Apartheid era.
The working class and
organised workers are under attack. Privatisation, job losses, low
wage increases and industrial restructuring are all measures by
South African monopoly capital and the new government that have
ensured that hard won gains have been and continue to be reversed
in the interests of capital’s relentless pursuit of maximising
profits. In addition, the HIV/AIDS epidemic is claiming the lives
of thousands of working class people. The government refuses to
provide proper medical services and drugs to stop the pandemic and
support those living with HIV/AIDS leading to an indirect genocide
of black working class people. Yet it is the same bourgeois ANC
government, leading the neo-liberal onslaught against the working
class that COSATU and the SACP has and is so loyally supporting.
This is our political conundrum, the classical situation of objective
factors being ripe for revolutionary struggles, but almost contradicted
by deep-seated subjective factors that undermine such possibilities.
However, as is always the case, ultimately the working class prevails
and over the past few years there have been signs of revival of
enradicalisation and militant struggles on the part of working class
people. Initially, by poor communities in response to issues relating
to housing and community service delivery such as water, sanitation
and electricity and more recently a strike wave by workers and their
trade unions.
But how are we to understand the new South Africa of being hailed
for being the biggest political miracle of the 20th century with
its most liberal and democratic on the one-hand and its worsening
conditions for the black working class majority, increasingly showing
signs of preparedness to struggle to improve its conditions?
The ANC, once the leading
liberation movement party, has crossed the class line and now leads
the new state, predominantly in the interests of white monopoly
capital through its neo-liberal economic policy.
The ANC secured the vast majority of the votes in South Africa's
first non-racial general elections in 1994 and again in 1999 and
2004. The election programme that the ANC took to the working class
was the Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP). Soon after
the elections the RDP was abandoned by the ANC government. In 1996
the ANC unveiled its macro-economic programme, Growth Employment
and Re-distribution (GEAR). GEAR made clear the economic orientation
of the government, as well as formalising many policies that were
already in place. With GEAR the few social democratic features of
the RDP were replaced with a neo-liberal framework. GEAR has made
the rich get richer, while the poor got poorer. Unlike many African
and other countries of the “South”, this neo-liberal
economic policy was not forced or imposed by institutions like the
World bank and IMF. It was self-imposed by the ANC government, with
advisers supplied by these institutions, in the belief similar to
the universal modern capitalist myth that South Africa would become
globally competitive, attract foreign investment, create jobs and
ensure wealth and prosperity for all.
We have not seen large-scale redistribution of wealth as promised
in the Freedom Charter and fought for by the millions of black working
class people. Instead, wealth and power has remained in the hands
of monopoly-capital. A thin layer of black petit-bourgeoisie has
managed to elevate them through affirmative action and black economic
empowerment to the status of a rich bourgeois elite. This layer
has largely enriched themselves through selective BEE handouts by
monopoly-capital, ready access to loan capital, purchasing privatised
parts of the state or through securing state contracts.
In the midst of massive and increasing poverty, South Africa has
experienced a millionaire boom. In just one year, BEE deals help
propel a phenomenal 5880 people into the 43000-strong ranks of the
seriously rich. Black economic empowerment deals created most of
South Africa’s 5880 new dollar millionaires last year. “South
Africa’s 15.9% growth of dollar millionaires in 2005 was phenomenal
... well above the global rate of 6.5%,” said Patrick McLaughlin,
the US-based spokesman for Capgemini which compiled the World Wealth
Report with Merrill Lynch.
The new millionaires have joined the ranks of the country’s
super-rich, such as business billionaires Jonathan Oppenheimer,
Johann Rupert, Patrice Motsepe and Tokyo Sexwale.
The new entry list has boosted the number of dollar millionaires
in the country to 42883, according to the 2006 World Wealth Report,
which monitored super-rich individuals in 68 countries.
It is this narrow segment of the black bourgeoisie that is the ANC’s
dominant social base in line with its political trajectory since
the late 1980’s. Although the ANC still enjoys overwhelming
support of the black working class, its policies are aimed at advancing
the interests of the black bourgeoisie and petit-bourgeoisie. These
classes and their economic interests are integrally tied to that
of monopoly capital in South Africa. Monopoly-capitalists, like
Anglo-American, own and control most of the country’s wealth.
In order to enrich themselves, the emerging black elite needs to
partner with the monopoly capitalists and offer them something in
return. The trend has been to enter into joint ventures and offering
the black elites easy access to capital in exchange for political
influence and support and access to lucrative state contracts in
the form of so-called “empowerment deals”.
Public service managers and ministers now belong to the highest
1% of all income earners in South Africa. These ex-comrades who
were previously part of the liberation movement now have nothing
in common with the masses. Together with the ANC government, they
are becoming the most ruthless in suppressing the working class
and its aspirations for a “better life”. It is for this
reason that Minister of Public Services, Geraldine Fraser Moleketi,
remains hard line in her approach when negotiating restructuring
and wages and conditions of employment in the public sector. Similarly,
President Thabo Mbeki’s constant chiding and rebuffing of
COSATU in its attempts to improve conditions for working class people.
Yet at the same time, the ANC leadership and government is warm
and supportive of the proposals for the economy by monopoly-capital,
such as the Brenthurst initiative by the Oppenheimer family. Interestingly,
these proposals promote “black economic empowerment”
for a bigger black bourgeoisie on the basis of tax-breaks and incentives
for those capitalists who assist in developing the black bourgeoisie.
Ultimately, it will be the black working class who will pay for
the further development of the black bourgeoisie. Tax-breaks for
monopoly capital that is already being promoted by government, comes
at the costs of less social support and services for working class
communities.
The Politics of Labour
and the Tri-partite Alliance
COSATU 2015 recognises that the ANC government bears much of the
responsibility for the decline in living standards of the working
class. It notes that the main cause of this has been the ANC government’s
stubborn implementation of its neo-liberal economic policy, GEAR.
Yet in a policy document it states, “the Alliance remains
the only weapon in the hands of our people to deepen transformation
and take our National Democratic Revolution to new heights”
and, “It would be class suicide if workers were to hand the
ANC over to the bourgeoisie on a silver platter”.
This perspective on the part of the COSATU leadership is guided
by the SACP two-stage notion of National Democratic Revolution which
has as its central task the creation of a democratic bourgeois state
and the national question dealt with upon the achievement of a significant
black section of the capitalist class. It is this that is the glue
of the Tri-partite Alliance and informs the approach by the SACP
and COSATU leadership to win the soul of the ANC and ensure its
“working class bias”.
The last 10 years have
also seen the consolidation of the COSATU leadership’s rightward
political shift that started in the late 1980’s. This could
be characterized as a shift from radical and militant trade unionism
to co-determination and “corporatism”. The radical and
militant period of COSATU culminated in the 1987 strike wave inspired
by the “Living-wage Campaign” and the insurrectionary
climate created by the preceding years of struggle by the masses
against the Apartheid government. The defeat of the mineworkers
strike during 1987 had a profound effect on the trade union leadership
who then seriously started to embrace the co-determinist and reconciliatory
approach with the capitalist ruling class. The international balance
of class forces at the time and later the collapse of the “socialist”
USSR and thereby “socialism”, also paved the way for
the ANC/SACP’s rightward shift and strengthening of the negotiated
settlement route for the national liberation of oppressed South
Africans. This further hastened the rightward shift of the COSATU
leadership, most of whom were members of the SACP.
Media and Labour Media
in South Africa
The mainstream media
in South Africa, like in the US, is highly monopolised. There are
two major news groups, the foreign owned Independent News &
Media PLC, a Dublin-based company are outright owners of Independent
Newspaper Group and Independent Online. The other group is Media
24, which has its roots in the former state supported, pro-Apartheid
company, Naspers. Television is dominated by the SABC, with 3 national
channels and an Africa wide channel. There are two other TV channels,
E-TV a private free to air channel which is owned by a union investment
company, Hosken Consolidated Investments (HCI). Yet is this TV channel
that flatly refused and created several financial obstacles against
starting a weekly 30-minute labour TV show.
In some cases, Independent
are the sole supplier of information for entire markets in the Southern
Hemisphere in which they represent a massive media cartel, shoving
out smaller operators, clamping down on dissent, censoring journalists
and recreating the news in their own image. After a period of stagnation
in which South Africa's press has been dominated by a few large
media groupings, the small press is making a come-back, albeit in
an unconventional format that draws inspiration from the world of
electronic publishing.
During the late eighties and early nineties there existed a thriving
small alternative press culture that had as its roots being part
of the anti-apartheid struggle with newspapers such as the Weekly
Mail, Vrye Weekblad, South and New Nation. Naturally the labour
and the mass movement of the 1980’s also had a strong media
culture with COSATU having its own monthly newspaper, bulletins
and leaflets. Pictures, banners, struggle t-shirts and posters were
regularly and creatively produced on meagre resources. This media
and struggle art culture took a nosedive during the early 1990’s,
ironically in a period of growing political democracy. The new democratic
order has a fairly liberal and democratic dispensation with the
media and the freedom of expression protected in the constitution.
However, media ownership and control fundamentally shapes the content
of the mainstream media either for commercial and/or political interests
by those who own it, despite progressive regulations. The labour
movement and progressive left-wing organisations have not taken
advantage of the democratic space and progressive legislation in
the media terrain. We have not yet prioritised the media as an important
sight of struggle. We have, for example, a big community radio sector
and an emerging community TV sector. The labour movement still does
not view this as an important opportunity to create its own voice
and reach out to its members and millions of unorganised and marginalised
workers.
Our other challenge is
the content of the media. Much of the mainstream media, as I said
is dominated by commercial interests, but as the stakes are increased
in class struggle terms, increasingly those in power seek to influence
the content and thereby public perception and opinion. Over the
past few years we’ve seen the state form its Government Communications
and Information Service (GCIS) which has as its primary role to
disseminate government information and propaganda. The dominant
group in government and the ANC has successfully managed to bring
top newspaper and TV editors under its influence. Over the past
few months there has been a major public scandal regarding the SABC’s
head of news who prepared a blacklist of commentators who are to
be excluded, effectively banned from SABC TV and radio.
Increasingly as Workers’
World Media Productions we have succeeded in ensuring a labour challenge
to the mainstream media and developing our own alternative, independent
media. However, these advances whilst big in their own terms are
not significant enough to mount a challenge to the mainstream media.
But we are getting there and our real success will be propelled
and as a consequence of a re-emerging mass movement that will have
as its rallying cry, revolutionary socialism.
Thank you.
Martin Jansen
|