Papers

The State of Working Class Struggle and Labour Media in South Africa
By Martin Jansen

Thank you very much to the organisers of the conference for inviting me and especially to share some information, insight and experiences of the South African situation pertaining to the struggle of the working class, the state of the labour movement and of course labour media.

In order to understand the South Africa of today one needs to understand its unique history, which lie in the developments at the turn of the 20th century, which could be summed up as a monopoly capitalist revolution from above. This was in contrast to England, elsewhere in Europe and in America, where monopoly capitalist rule during the imperialist epoch emerged after about 50-100 years of progressive capitalist development.
Monopoly capitalism was brutally transplanted into South Africa over a much shorter and more concentrated period of time and at a relatively late stage of the imperialist epoch.
Within a few decades of the discovery of diamonds and gold, in the 1870s and 1880s, a huge capitalist social revolution occurred, radically transforming all social relations in South Africa. This was a bourgeois revolution from above, fought in the name of the monopoly capitalist bourgeoisie. Vast amounts of British, American and South African capital were invested in diamond and gold mining.
A new black working class of migrant miners was created at a forced pace, causing great social misery and devastation in the pre-capitalist societies of South and Southern Africa.

In the period 1899-1902 a bloody three-year long imperialist war, the Anglo-Boer War, was fought on South African soil, resulting in the triumph of the imperialism over the semi-feudal Afrikaner landowners. A new racist capitalist state and White bourgeois democracy was established in 1910. For the White monopoly capitalist bourgeoisie, liberal democracy, with its notions of universal rights and freedoms, including one-parson-one-vote, was an unaffordable luxury. The black majority of workers and peasants were excluded from this racist democracy. At the same time, the racist capitalist state played a key role in systematically co-opting white workers and the petty-bourgeoisie into supporting monopoly capitalist relations. This co-option largely occurred under the banner of Afrikaner nationalism.

The new racist state ensured rapid capitalist development and over the past 100 years of monopoly capitalist rule, first the colonial state and then, from 1910, the racist capitalist state assisted in the further expansion the monopoly capitalist national bourgeoisie from mining into other sectors of the economy. To assist overall capitalist development, the state developed infrastructure and systems of transport and communication. It established para-statal companies in key sectors (iron and steel, coal production and electricity generation). It also assisted in the emergence and consolidation of an Afrikaans-speaking bourgeoisie, that also became increasingly monopoly capitalist in character.

Naturally, to secure its racial capitalist framework of white wealth and privilege and black exclusion and oppression, it had to have effective and large repressive organs of state to ensure the suppression of the black masses and their organizations. It therefore also guaranteed the maintenance of law and order, including the suppression of strikes and other forms of mass unrest. Even White workers were violently crushed in the miners’ strike of 1922. In the period after the Second World War, the apartheid-capitalist state brutally suppressed the 1946 mineworkers strike and crushed the mass struggles of the 1950s, banning the ANC, the PAC and the SACP and jailing thousands of leaders.

Having crushed the mass uprising, the apartheid-capitalist state presided over the boom years of economic growth in the 1960s. These years saw the further strengthening of monopoly capitalism, including the increased merger of English- and Afrikaans-speaking monopoly capitalist corporations, as well as the establishment of foreign monopoly capitalist firms, especially in the manufacturing sector. The apartheid state introduced a range of new oppressive laws, expanded its bureaucracy and repressive apparatuses (police, army, courts) and consolidated the monstrous Bantustan system to keep the black working class divided and in a state of fear and subservience. All these actions served to stabilize conditions of capital accumulation and to raise the rate of profit to record levels.

Despite this, the black working class regrouped and responded in the context of economic crisis and declining living standards during the early 1970’s. And in 1973, we experience and mass re-awakening of working class struggle through the Durban strikes which saw over 70 000 workers come out in spontaneous strikes. This re-ignited the movement and was the beginning of the new progressive left-wing trade unions that led to the formation first of FOSATU and later COSATU in 1985.

Moreover it sparked a radical and militant struggle movement that was to last two decades. This struggle, that involved vast sections of the working class and often led by the trade union movement through COSATU, reached heights of struggle that bordered on insurrection or even pre-revolution until eventually the Apartheid regime entered into negotiations with the liberation movement leaders, primarily the ANC to end Apartheid and introduce a new democratic dispensation based on universal suffrage of one person, one vote.

COSATU Then and Now

During the 1980’s, COSATU was at the forefront of the Mass Democratic Movement, along with the United Democratic Front, in the struggle for freedom from oppression and exploitation against the Apartheid government and the capitalist class. At the time, COSATU’s radicalism, militancy and strength of organization elevated it to being the most revered and respected trade union organization in the world. Millions of workers in South Africa and the world looked towards COSATU as a shining example of struggle against capitalism and advancing the struggle for socialism. Today, COSATU is a shadow of its former self, largely inactive in mass struggles and its focus of activity has shifted away from struggles on the ground, workplaces and communities, to the boardrooms of NEDLAC and similar fora. I say this despite the several general strikes around COSATU’s jobs and poverty campaign as these campaigns are designed and carried out extremely bureaucratically, without much involvement and direction given by ordinary COSATU members. The centre of this campaign and like so many others in recent years is located at the level of the COSATU CEC and its office-bearers.

Many of its current leaders, union officials and several shop-stewards at various levels and in most of its affiliated trade unions, have degenerated politically, with very little inclination to lead and immerse themselves into mass struggles around issues that affect their members or working class communities. The trade union movement in South Africa, with COSATU at its helm, has essentially become bureaucratized with very little democratic participation of its members and little or no inclination towards the orientation of the COSATU during the 1980’s, namely radical, militant and organized and generally inspired by the struggle for socialism as an integral part of the struggle to overthrow the then Apartheid regime. However, upon careful historical scrutiny of COSATU then and now, we will observe as many of us knew then, that the dominant political currents within COSATU were not by any means revolutionary and were thoroughly reformist in their political orientations. This understanding goes a long way to explaining the COSATU and its affiliates’ leadership’s ready acceptance of the negotiated political settlement and betrayal of working class interests by the ANC and the Tri-partite Alliance.

The Socio-economic Conditions of the South African Working Class

In addition to the loss of millions of jobs, working class people have also been set back in various ways and have seen a drastic drop in their living standards.
According to the Bureau for Market Research;
• In real terms, from 1995 to 2000, the average working class household has seen a 19% fall in income.
• 37% of households survive on less than R1000 (US$140) per month.
• Workers have debts of R15-billion with micro-lenders, R10-billion with furniture retailers and R18-billion with their local municipalities.
Widespread poverty was a feature of life under apartheid and remains so under the new democracy. However, mass poverty coincides with record level socio-economic nequalities. After all, we are the second most unequal society in the world! These intolerable inequalities have in fact, despite the achievements of the new democracy, intensified over the past ten years. Mass poverty, appalling living and health conditions and gross socio-economic inequalities coincide with numerous indices of social disintegration - violence, abuse, crime, alcoholism, substance abuse, family and household breakdown and prostitution. The HIV/AIDS pandemic magnifies all these terrible features of social and economic life in South Africa.

The Taylor Report commissioned by government and done by reputable social researchers estimated that between 20 and 28 million South Africans, i.e. between 45 and 63 percent of the population are currently living in poverty. 71% of people in rural areas are poor while 29 % of people in urban areas are poor. The average poor household in rural areas would need an increase in income of over 70% to reach the poverty line, compared more than 40% in metropolitan areas. About 13, 7 million people, live in rural areas and 85% of rural African households earned less than R1500 (US$200) per month. Young African women in the rural areas have the highest chance of being unemployed in South Africa.
This extreme and deteriorating situation has even forced the Minister of Social Development was to remark, “South Africa is experiencing a deep social crisis. Indeed we are sitting on a time bomb of poverty and social disintegration” (2002)

Ironically, the South African “democratic breakthrough”, for the working class has meant being bled to death by the capitalist system.

Despite these socio-economic setbacks organised labour and the working class remains resilient and willing to fight to defend itself. However, not many consistent struggles on the part of COSATU and other working class formations have happened over the last number of years. Trade unions and other organisations have in fact been weakened, despite the democratic space and opportunities when compared to the Apartheid era.

The working class and organised workers are under attack. Privatisation, job losses, low wage increases and industrial restructuring are all measures by South African monopoly capital and the new government that have ensured that hard won gains have been and continue to be reversed in the interests of capital’s relentless pursuit of maximising profits. In addition, the HIV/AIDS epidemic is claiming the lives of thousands of working class people. The government refuses to provide proper medical services and drugs to stop the pandemic and support those living with HIV/AIDS leading to an indirect genocide of black working class people. Yet it is the same bourgeois ANC government, leading the neo-liberal onslaught against the working class that COSATU and the SACP has and is so loyally supporting. This is our political conundrum, the classical situation of objective factors being ripe for revolutionary struggles, but almost contradicted by deep-seated subjective factors that undermine such possibilities. However, as is always the case, ultimately the working class prevails and over the past few years there have been signs of revival of enradicalisation and militant struggles on the part of working class people. Initially, by poor communities in response to issues relating to housing and community service delivery such as water, sanitation and electricity and more recently a strike wave by workers and their trade unions.

But how are we to understand the new South Africa of being hailed for being the biggest political miracle of the 20th century with its most liberal and democratic on the one-hand and its worsening conditions for the black working class majority, increasingly showing signs of preparedness to struggle to improve its conditions?

The ANC, once the leading liberation movement party, has crossed the class line and now leads the new state, predominantly in the interests of white monopoly capital through its neo-liberal economic policy.

The ANC secured the vast majority of the votes in South Africa's first non-racial general elections in 1994 and again in 1999 and 2004. The election programme that the ANC took to the working class was the Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP). Soon after the elections the RDP was abandoned by the ANC government. In 1996 the ANC unveiled its macro-economic programme, Growth Employment and Re-distribution (GEAR). GEAR made clear the economic orientation of the government, as well as formalising many policies that were already in place. With GEAR the few social democratic features of the RDP were replaced with a neo-liberal framework. GEAR has made the rich get richer, while the poor got poorer. Unlike many African and other countries of the “South”, this neo-liberal economic policy was not forced or imposed by institutions like the World bank and IMF. It was self-imposed by the ANC government, with advisers supplied by these institutions, in the belief similar to the universal modern capitalist myth that South Africa would become globally competitive, attract foreign investment, create jobs and ensure wealth and prosperity for all.
We have not seen large-scale redistribution of wealth as promised in the Freedom Charter and fought for by the millions of black working class people. Instead, wealth and power has remained in the hands of monopoly-capital. A thin layer of black petit-bourgeoisie has managed to elevate them through affirmative action and black economic empowerment to the status of a rich bourgeois elite. This layer has largely enriched themselves through selective BEE handouts by monopoly-capital, ready access to loan capital, purchasing privatised parts of the state or through securing state contracts.
In the midst of massive and increasing poverty, South Africa has experienced a millionaire boom. In just one year, BEE deals help propel a phenomenal 5880 people into the 43000-strong ranks of the seriously rich. Black economic empowerment deals created most of South Africa’s 5880 new dollar millionaires last year. “South Africa’s 15.9% growth of dollar millionaires in 2005 was phenomenal ... well above the global rate of 6.5%,” said Patrick McLaughlin, the US-based spokesman for Capgemini which compiled the World Wealth Report with Merrill Lynch.
The new millionaires have joined the ranks of the country’s super-rich, such as business billionaires Jonathan Oppenheimer, Johann Rupert, Patrice Motsepe and Tokyo Sexwale.
The new entry list has boosted the number of dollar millionaires in the country to 42883, according to the 2006 World Wealth Report, which monitored super-rich individuals in 68 countries.
It is this narrow segment of the black bourgeoisie that is the ANC’s dominant social base in line with its political trajectory since the late 1980’s. Although the ANC still enjoys overwhelming support of the black working class, its policies are aimed at advancing the interests of the black bourgeoisie and petit-bourgeoisie. These classes and their economic interests are integrally tied to that of monopoly capital in South Africa. Monopoly-capitalists, like Anglo-American, own and control most of the country’s wealth. In order to enrich themselves, the emerging black elite needs to partner with the monopoly capitalists and offer them something in return. The trend has been to enter into joint ventures and offering the black elites easy access to capital in exchange for political influence and support and access to lucrative state contracts in the form of so-called “empowerment deals”.

Public service managers and ministers now belong to the highest 1% of all income earners in South Africa. These ex-comrades who were previously part of the liberation movement now have nothing in common with the masses. Together with the ANC government, they are becoming the most ruthless in suppressing the working class and its aspirations for a “better life”. It is for this reason that Minister of Public Services, Geraldine Fraser Moleketi, remains hard line in her approach when negotiating restructuring and wages and conditions of employment in the public sector. Similarly, President Thabo Mbeki’s constant chiding and rebuffing of COSATU in its attempts to improve conditions for working class people. Yet at the same time, the ANC leadership and government is warm and supportive of the proposals for the economy by monopoly-capital, such as the Brenthurst initiative by the Oppenheimer family. Interestingly, these proposals promote “black economic empowerment” for a bigger black bourgeoisie on the basis of tax-breaks and incentives for those capitalists who assist in developing the black bourgeoisie. Ultimately, it will be the black working class who will pay for the further development of the black bourgeoisie. Tax-breaks for monopoly capital that is already being promoted by government, comes at the costs of less social support and services for working class communities.

The Politics of Labour and the Tri-partite Alliance
COSATU 2015 recognises that the ANC government bears much of the responsibility for the decline in living standards of the working class. It notes that the main cause of this has been the ANC government’s stubborn implementation of its neo-liberal economic policy, GEAR. Yet in a policy document it states, “the Alliance remains the only weapon in the hands of our people to deepen transformation and take our National Democratic Revolution to new heights” and, “It would be class suicide if workers were to hand the ANC over to the bourgeoisie on a silver platter”.

This perspective on the part of the COSATU leadership is guided by the SACP two-stage notion of National Democratic Revolution which has as its central task the creation of a democratic bourgeois state and the national question dealt with upon the achievement of a significant black section of the capitalist class. It is this that is the glue of the Tri-partite Alliance and informs the approach by the SACP and COSATU leadership to win the soul of the ANC and ensure its “working class bias”.

The last 10 years have also seen the consolidation of the COSATU leadership’s rightward political shift that started in the late 1980’s. This could be characterized as a shift from radical and militant trade unionism to co-determination and “corporatism”. The radical and militant period of COSATU culminated in the 1987 strike wave inspired by the “Living-wage Campaign” and the insurrectionary climate created by the preceding years of struggle by the masses against the Apartheid government. The defeat of the mineworkers strike during 1987 had a profound effect on the trade union leadership who then seriously started to embrace the co-determinist and reconciliatory approach with the capitalist ruling class. The international balance of class forces at the time and later the collapse of the “socialist” USSR and thereby “socialism”, also paved the way for the ANC/SACP’s rightward shift and strengthening of the negotiated settlement route for the national liberation of oppressed South Africans. This further hastened the rightward shift of the COSATU leadership, most of whom were members of the SACP.

Media and Labour Media in South Africa

The mainstream media in South Africa, like in the US, is highly monopolised. There are two major news groups, the foreign owned Independent News & Media PLC, a Dublin-based company are outright owners of Independent Newspaper Group and Independent Online. The other group is Media 24, which has its roots in the former state supported, pro-Apartheid company, Naspers. Television is dominated by the SABC, with 3 national channels and an Africa wide channel. There are two other TV channels, E-TV a private free to air channel which is owned by a union investment company, Hosken Consolidated Investments (HCI). Yet is this TV channel that flatly refused and created several financial obstacles against starting a weekly 30-minute labour TV show.

In some cases, Independent are the sole supplier of information for entire markets in the Southern Hemisphere in which they represent a massive media cartel, shoving out smaller operators, clamping down on dissent, censoring journalists and recreating the news in their own image. After a period of stagnation in which South Africa's press has been dominated by a few large media groupings, the small press is making a come-back, albeit in an unconventional format that draws inspiration from the world of electronic publishing.
During the late eighties and early nineties there existed a thriving small alternative press culture that had as its roots being part of the anti-apartheid struggle with newspapers such as the Weekly Mail, Vrye Weekblad, South and New Nation. Naturally the labour and the mass movement of the 1980’s also had a strong media culture with COSATU having its own monthly newspaper, bulletins and leaflets. Pictures, banners, struggle t-shirts and posters were regularly and creatively produced on meagre resources. This media and struggle art culture took a nosedive during the early 1990’s, ironically in a period of growing political democracy. The new democratic order has a fairly liberal and democratic dispensation with the media and the freedom of expression protected in the constitution. However, media ownership and control fundamentally shapes the content of the mainstream media either for commercial and/or political interests by those who own it, despite progressive regulations. The labour movement and progressive left-wing organisations have not taken advantage of the democratic space and progressive legislation in the media terrain. We have not yet prioritised the media as an important sight of struggle. We have, for example, a big community radio sector and an emerging community TV sector. The labour movement still does not view this as an important opportunity to create its own voice and reach out to its members and millions of unorganised and marginalised workers.

Our other challenge is the content of the media. Much of the mainstream media, as I said is dominated by commercial interests, but as the stakes are increased in class struggle terms, increasingly those in power seek to influence the content and thereby public perception and opinion. Over the past few years we’ve seen the state form its Government Communications and Information Service (GCIS) which has as its primary role to disseminate government information and propaganda. The dominant group in government and the ANC has successfully managed to bring top newspaper and TV editors under its influence. Over the past few months there has been a major public scandal regarding the SABC’s head of news who prepared a blacklist of commentators who are to be excluded, effectively banned from SABC TV and radio.

Increasingly as Workers’ World Media Productions we have succeeded in ensuring a labour challenge to the mainstream media and developing our own alternative, independent media. However, these advances whilst big in their own terms are not significant enough to mount a challenge to the mainstream media. But we are getting there and our real success will be propelled and as a consequence of a re-emerging mass movement that will have as its rallying cry, revolutionary socialism.

Thank you.
Martin Jansen



 

 

 

 

home | conferences/registration | audio/video | archives | how to | contacts

© 2005 2006 LaborTech.net    All Rights Reserved

  LaborTech Papers

Conference Papers
Michael Perelman
Art Shostak
Dick Meister
Jeff Richardson
Frank Emspak
Martin Jansen
Chris Witteman
Sid Shniad
Fred Bruggeman, AEI Strike Paper
Colette Washington
Jiyoung Lee

Adrian Scott
Pat Daley
CWA-Speed Matters